Nonw Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Nonw - Essay ExampleFor Patricia Muir, the carrying mental object of the earth is the maximum theoretical population size that pull up stakes remain stable if and only if the supply of resources does non change. However, this is indeed theoretical at best because not only does population size change all the time, but the supply of resources also change unconditional of population changes. The worst case scenario, t here(predicate)fore, based on Muirs definition, is that the population size will musical accompaniment increasing, the supply of resources will keep decreasing, and this will most likely drive the population to instability. Stability, as implied by Muir, is the state where the population may not experience any social or economic problems cogitate to survival and ease of living. Sarah Postel, in her article Carrying Capacity Earths Bottom Line, defines carrying cogency in a rather simple way as the largest number of any given species that a home ground can support i ndefinitely (4). There is no idea of stabilization driven at here by Postel, as based on her definition, carrying capability is simply the capacity of the earth to feed a certain maximum number of people, whether or not this will lead to stability. Nevertheless, the definitions of Muir and Postel are far from the globe of the situation for several other factors that affect carrying capacity are not being considered in their definitions. found on data from Cornell University, the carrying capacity of the earth is estimated to be 10 to 15 billion people, but estimates since 1679 by Anton van Leeuwhenhoek to the present have varied at the range between 1 billion to everywhere a trillion people. The variations are due to the fact that it is admittedly difficult to estimate the human carrying capacity of the earth (The Carrying Capacity). The true reason behind this degree of uncertainty is that the world has been divers(prenominal) in different eras in history and humans had differe nt needs and different lifestyles for every part of his history. This is evident during the choppy exponential rise in human population from 1400 to the present while it remained fairly stable centuries forwards 1400, and no one knows for sure why this happened (Cohen 341). Another reason for the uncertainty in determining the carrying capacity of the earth is that the governments of the world do not exactly know what factors ultimately determine carrying capacity. Among the factors being considered on that point are food, nutrients, space, technology specifically and the availability of each (The Carrying Capacity). Still, other experts say that the problem is not deep down the environment but with peoples social, political and economic activities, which are all affected by culture, religion, language, values and ethnicity (Cohen 341). Others like Hardin theorize that the earth actually has its own natural way of correcting its own carrying capacity and the problem is that peop les ethical beliefs, like Human life is sacred