Is Prvnt_on lwys Bttr thn Cur The case of Brst Cncr Scrn_ng Assignment

Is Prvnt_on lwys Bttr thn Cur The case of Brst Cncr Scrn_ng - subsidisation ExampleThe introduction of the new health c atomic number 18 policy in the 1970s which emphasized on health promotion as the proposed strategy for the stripe of diseases, in particular diseases in which lifestyle factors had a definitive causative role, marked the beginning of this new era of contraceptive medicine (Larsen, 2010). Over the centuries, in that respect has been a widespread belief amongst both the health care providers and the general population that prevention is emend than cure. However, the effectiveness of such an approach towards health care is oft debated and more recently, the term Preventionitis, which challenges this belief, has evolved and has gained popularity. Preventionitis is a political term that seeks to question the commonly held belief that prevention is a better and a more greet effective method, than curing a range of the nations health problems. In the view of many, many preventative medicine works whilst much does not. In addition, the costs of failure are high and this challenges the article of faith that prevention is cheaper than cure (Le Fanu & Social personal matters Unit, 1994). The provision of enlistment health services falls under the domain of public health. Public health is an umbrella term which encompasses a wide range of health services offered to the public and has been defined as The science and art of preventing disease, prolonging life and promoting health through nonionic efforts of the society (Ewles & Simnett, 2003). Preventive Medicine offers a wide range of services for the public, including and not limited to, in-person health checks, family planning and immunization (Ewles & Simnett, 2003). In addition, other services offered include health education, screening for versatile diseases, counselling regarding health care and adaptation of healthy behaviours, and provision of preventive medications in cases where it is available (USPSTF, 2010). It is important to remember, however, that public health is a multidisciplinary and multifaceted phenomenon and its scope is not just limited to the aforementioned services. The opponents of the preventive approach to health care present several arguments against the effectiveness of preventive strategies in health promotion. It is believed that prevention of illness is limited by the fact that most of us live out our natural life and die of disease that is determined by the ageing process since this is a predetermined phenomenon, any avail in an individuals lifespan or quality of life is small (Le Fanu & Social Affairs Unit, 1994). Studies fork up revealed that the increase in life expectancy by preventing or curing all cancers for those amongst the ages of 15 and 65, even if this were possible, would be only seven months. Moreover, the limitation of prevention policies by epidemiology, which raises association mingled with disease and life style factors, is unhelpful in providing proof (Le Fanu & Social Affairs Unit, 1994). Thus, all these factors have contributed towards the questionable nature of the efficacy of preventive health services being offered to the public. An important aspect of preventive health is health awareness which can be achieved by health education. An effective strategy in promoting screening modalities for cancers amongst the general public is by means of mass awareness campaigns. Awareness campaigns relating to cancer are common at the present