Waiting for Godot is Not an Absurdist Play :: Waiting for Godot Essays

Waiting for Godot is Not an Absurdist Play Samuel Becketts stage plays argon gray both in color and in subject matter. Likewise, the respond to the question of whether or not Becketts work is Absurdist also belongs to that realm of gray in which Beckett often plant life. The Absurdist label becomes problematic when applied to Beckett because his dramatic works tend to overflow the boundaries which scholars attempt to assign. When discussing Beckett, the critic inevitably becomes entangled in contradiction. The playwrights own denial that there is a philosophical system stern the plays and his explicit refusal to reduce them to codified interlingual renditions suggests, one could argue, that to search for such systems or interpretations in Becketts work is, at best, a fruitless endeavor (Beckett quoted. in McMillan 13). Let me suggest, however, that Becketts own statements and criticisms not be taken as a deterrent to the study of his work. His objections threaten onl y those interpretations which reduce his work. The challenge for the critic, then, is to evaluate and analyze Beckett in such a way that his works atomic number 18 not reduced but enhanced. The problem with designating Becketts work as Absurdist is, precisely, that this interpretation reduces his work. When a critic describes a work as Absurd, she does not only if mean that the work is outrageous or nonsensical or exactly silly. Coined by Ameri fire critic Martin Esslin, the term subject field of the Absurd can be defined as a kind of drama that presents a view of the absurdity of the human condition by the abandoning of usual or rational devices and by the use of nonrealistic form....Conceived in perplexity and spiritual anguish, the theater of the absurd portrays not a series of connected incidents telling a story but a pattern of images presenting people as bedevil beings in an incomprehensible universe. (Holman 2) In the introduction to The Theatre of the Absurd, Martin Esslin provides a all-encompassing explanation of Absurdist theater. He quotes Albert Camus jThe Myth of Sisyphus A world that can be explained by reasoning, however faulty, is a familiar world. But in a universe that is suddenly deprived of illusions and of light, man feels a stranger. His is an irremediable exile, because he is deprived of memories of a lost homeland as much as he lacks the hope of a promised